As of 7/6/20 our Silicon Valley facility is fully operational with capacity to support essential medical, defense & other printed circuit board fabrication projects. Please contact our team for assistance: or 510-933-9000

Wednesday, July 08th

Routing Signals Between PWB Layers – Part 2 An Emissions Example


Routing Signals Between PWB Layers –  Part 2, An Emissions Example

Relative Emmissions for Two Paths

Figure 1. Relative Emissions for Two Paths

Figure 1. Relative Emissions for Two Paths

(one passes from top to bottom layer (plot with peaks) and the other stays on one side)

Abstract: Printed wiring board, PWB, signal paths must often change layers in a board stackup. Under some conditions this can cause problems. An emissions example is used to illustrate the conditions where changing layers can cause problems.

Discussion:  Routing paths in a PWB often requires the paths to change layers to accomplish the layout. For a four layer PWB, this usually means changing from the top layer to the bottom layer of the board, the two middle layers being power and ground. A four layer board is especially problematical because generally the separation between the power and ground layers is relatively large, on the order of 30 to 40 mils, compared to boards with six or more layers.

Figure 1 depicts emissions from the board shown in Figure 2, the same one used for an ESD example in last month’s April 2006 Technical Tidbit, The paths on the board are about 30 cm in length. One stays on the same side of the board while the other passes through to the other side for about 10 cm. The two metal planes are about 30 mils apart and are shorted together by the SMA connectors and at the 47 Ohm load resistors. The paths are made of one insulated conductor made from 24 gauge twisted pair telephone wire. Since the original cable had a differential impedance of 100 Ohms, one of the wires taped down to a copper plane will have a characteristic impedance of 50 Ohms with respect to the metal plane.

The data for Figure 1 was generated by exciting one path with the tracking generator of a spectrum analyzer and attaching an emissions measurement antenna to the input of the spectrum analyzer. The antenna had reasonable antenna factors up to about 3 GHz. Figure 3 shows the board sitting on a cardboard box in an EMC chamber. The coax on the left comes from the tracking generator and the one meter white wire on the right is just hanging off the box connected to one of the board planes by an alligator clip. It was included in case signal voltage on the planes might cause attached cables to radiate. The coaxial cable shield and the added wire form something of a dipole, albeit an asymmetric one.


Test Board with Paths

Figure 2. Test Board with Paths on a Single Layer and Two Layers

Emissions Test Setup

Figure 3. Emissions Test Setup

Figure 1 was generated by overlaying emissions data from the two paths shown in Figure 2. The plots cover the frequency range from near DC up to 2.9 GHz. The absolute magnitude of the plots is not important. It depends on the output power of the tracking generator, but the comparison between the two plots is striking. The lower trace resulted from the path that stayed on one side of the board while the upper trace, showing pronounced peaks, resulted when the path that passed through the board was energized. Note that the first peak at 247 MHz is nearly 30 dB above the emissions at that frequency from the path that stayed on the same side of the board.

Figure 4 shows the signal currents in the wire and planes as the signal passes through the boards. As described in detail in last month’s April 2006 Technical Tidbit, a complex interplane impedance, Z, appears in the signal return path as it passes between the planes. The voltage generated across this impedance by the signal current as well as other effects contribute to the emissions shown in Figure 1.

Signal Paths Through a Via

Figure 4. Signal Paths Through a Via

For cases where the interplane distance is much smaller than 30 mils, the interplane impedance will also generally be lower as well and the effect shown in Figure 1 will be smaller and less of a problem. The effect can also be minimized for a four layer board if critical signals transition from the top layer to the bottom layer of the board near existing (for low cost) bypass capacitors.

Summary: Transitioning between layers of a PWB can introduce significant impairment into a signal path. The larger the spacing between power and ground planes, the larger the effect. The example of a “four layer” PWB emissions profile shows one of the problems that can occur.

Douglas C. Smith

Address: P. O. Box 1457, Los Gatos, CA 95031

TEL: 800-323-3956/408-356-4186

FAX: 408-358-3799

Mobile: 408-858-4528



You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments are closed.